<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nobody Likes Michael Ignatieff &#187; Conservative Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/archives/category/blogs/con-blogs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nobodylikesignatieff.com</link>
	<description>An honest look at the Liberal leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>This blogger calls Ignatieff on his lies</title>
		<link>http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/archives/94</link>
		<comments>http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/archives/94#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 02:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nobody Likes Ignatieff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were to only read the headlines over the past few weeks you would see Ignatieff pull complete reversals on almost every statement he has made over the past 10 months. In some cases you would find him go back on his original attitude, only to switch back while pretending he never changed his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were to only read the headlines over the past few weeks you would see Ignatieff pull complete reversals on almost every statement he has made over the past 10 months. In some cases you would find him go back on his original attitude, only to switch back while pretending he never changed his mind at all along the way. Luckily the Canadian public is a lot more intelligent than he takes us for. The Alberta Ardvark tells it like it is.</p>
<p><span id="more-94"></span></p>
<blockquote>
<h3><a href="http://thealbertaardvark.blogspot.com/2009/10/down-in-polls-ignatieff-tries-lying-his.html">Down in the polls Ignatieff tries lying his way out.</a></h3>
<p>Having <a href="http://thealbertaardvark.blogspot.com/2009/10/when-is-stand-on-principle-not-really.html">again abandoned his principles</a> Ignatieff attempts to lie his way out of his own words and threats.</p>
<p>Michael Ignatieff: source <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/10/09/ignatieff-strategy-harper.html">CBC Story</a> :<span style="font-weight: bold;">“<span style="color: #ff0000; font-style: italic;">What I’ve said consistently for a month is in those cases where the government brings forth legislation we can support or approve or amend, we’ll do so. My strategy is not to make parliamentary government impossible</span>.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />
</span>What a joke. Now Ignatieff wants us to believe that he never said<span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span> &#8220;<span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Mr Harper, your time is up. The Liberal Party cannot support this government any further. We will hold it to account. We will oppose it in Parliament</span>.&#8221; </span>in early September with the same threats and talk of &#8220;principle&#8221; repeated to the press multiple times over the last month<span style="font-style: italic;">.</span> (<a href="http://thealbertaardvark.blogspot.com/2009/10/when-is-stand-on-principle-not-really.html">previous post with examples</a>)</p>
<p>This has now reached the point of pure lunacy and it is becoming almost a <a href="http://theplaceofbiff.blogspot.com/2009/10/iggy.html">daily occurrence</a> to see 180 degree turns on statements and policy. I am at a loss for words as to how stupid this all is.</p>
<p>Speaking of which. How are the Liberals now going to reconcile what Ignatieff has just said with the fact that they <a href="http://thealbertaardvark.blogspot.com/2009/09/liberals-vote-against-reno-tax-credit.html">voted against the renovation tax credit 3 weeks ago</a>.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Does this mean that they really are opposed to the renovation tax credit?</span></p>
<p>It must be because after all Ignatieff has said &#8216;consistently for a month&#8217; that they would support legislation they agreed with.</p>
<p>Or is that another lie? I am having a hard time keeping up.</p>
<p>To quote another blogger on Ignatieff: <span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://thealbertaardvark.blogspot.com/2009/09/must-read-scathing-criticism-of.html"><span style="font-style: italic;">He is done – and if he isn’t, he should be. </span></a></p>
<p>Update: You can listen for yourself to <a href="http://torydrroy.blogspot.com/2009/10/cbc-house-iffy-grit-who-cried-wolf.html">Ignatieff&#8217;s historical revisionism at Dr. Roy&#8217;s</a>.</p></blockquote>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fnobodylikesignatieff.com%2Farchives%2F94&amp;linkname=This%20blogger%20calls%20Ignatieff%20on%20his%20lies"><img src="http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/archives/94/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasons to fear Ignatieff, worse than taxes</title>
		<link>http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/archives/47</link>
		<comments>http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/archives/47#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nobody Likes Ignatieff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As pointed out on the Shotgun Blog, the scariest thing about Michael Ignatieff is not that is going to raise taxes. It&#8217;s that he is going to hand-pick regions and industries that he believes deserve your tax dollars, and then give it to them. Certain industries to Michael Ignatieff are too important to Canada for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As pointed out on the <a href="http://westernstandard.blogs.com/shotgun/2009/10/taxation-not-my-real-worry-for-an-ignatieff-government.html" target="_blank">Shotgun Blog</a>, the scariest thing about Michael Ignatieff is not that is going to raise taxes. It&#8217;s that he is going to hand-pick regions and industries that he believes deserve your tax dollars, and then give it to them. Certain industries to Michael Ignatieff are too important to Canada for Canadians to decide whether or not to support them on their own. If we like things, we buy them. If we don&#8217;t like them, we don&#8217;t buy them. If Michael Ignatieff gets his way, we&#8217;ll be buying the things we&#8217;ve decided we don&#8217;t like.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fnobodylikesignatieff.com%2Farchives%2F47&amp;linkname=Reasons%20to%20fear%20Ignatieff%2C%20worse%20than%20taxes"><img src="http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nobodylikesignatieff.com/archives/47/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
