Found here. Emphasis added.
Ignatieff is an erudite and thoughtful person; his writings are intelligent and profound. Not so his stammering political pronouncements. Pace his erudition, he is to political mud wrestling as a fish is to dry land – thrashing around trying to find its breath. There is really little difference in style and substance between Ignatieff and his predecessor Stéphane Dion, save the English language.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
You must be logged in to post a comment.